When only downloading via BitTorrent appeared on the light, everyone already knew that this was worth the future of downloading files from the Internet. So it turned out, but for downloading torrent files, special programs are needed - torrent clients. Such clients are MediaGet and μTorrent, and in this article we will deal with what is better.
And μTorrent and MediaGet firmly secured on tops among torrent customers. But no longer once the question appeared, what program from these two is in the ranking above another? In this article, we will analyze all the pros and cons of both programs on the shelves and find out who copes with their duties of the torrent client better.
Download mediaget.
Download UTorrent
What is better torrent or media get
Interface
The interface is not the main feature of these two applications, but still more pleasant and more convenient to work with the program where everything is not easy and understandable, but also beautifully. Under this parameter, the media gets very far away from μTorrent, and the second design was not updated at all from the very appearance of the program.
MediaGet:
μTorrent:
MediaGet 1: 0 μTorrent
Search
The search is an important part of downloading files, because without searching does not find the desired distribution. When there was no media gee, I had to look for torrent files on the Internet, which made a slightly process, but as soon as Media Gute appeared on the market of torrent clients, everyone began to use this function, although the MediaGet programmers were performed first. In μTorrent, there is also a search, but the problem is that the search opens the Internet page, and in the media gest, the search process occurs directly in the program.MediaGet 2: 0 μTorrent
Catalog
The catalog contains everything that can be downloaded to torrent. There are movies, games, books and even viewing TV series online. But the catalog is only available in the media het, which is again the pebble in the garden of μTorrent, which does not have this function at all.
MediaGet 3: 0 μTorrent
Player
The opportunity to watch movies during download is in both torrent clients, however, in the MediaGet player is performed more correctly and beautifully. In μTorrent, it is made in the banal style of the standard Windows player, and has its big minus - it is not available in the free version. In addition, it is available only in the most expensive version of the program, which costs more than 1,200 rubles, while in the media het it is available immediately.
MediaGet 4: 0 μTorrent
Download speed
Here is the main reason for all disputes. The one who has more download speed, and should be the winner in this comparison, but, the verification of these indicators of the winner did not reveal. For comparison, the same torrent file was taken, which was first launched using MediaGet, and then with μTorrent. The speed jumping up, then down, as it usually happens, but the average they have almost the same.
MediaGet:
μTorrent:
It turned out a draw, but it was expected, because the download speed depends on the number of siders (distributing) and your speed of the Internet, but not from the program itself.
MediaGet 5: 1 μTorrent
Free
It wins media gets, because the program is completely free and all functions are available immediately, which does not apply to μTorrent. The free version allows you to use only the main function - download files. All other functions are available only in the program. There is also a version without advertising, which is a little cheaper than the pro-version, and in MediaGet, even if there is an advertisement, but it is easily closed and does not interfere.MediaGet 6: 1 μTorrent
Additional comparisons
As statistics show, up to 70% of files are distributed using μTorrent. This is due to the fact that more people enjoy the program. Of course, most of these people most likely did not even hear about other torrent clients, but the numbers speak for themselves. Plus, the program is very light and productive to this, and does not load the computer as the media gets (which is noticeable only on weak computers). In general, for these two indicators, μTorrent wins, and the score becomes:
MediaGet 6: 3 μTorrent
As you can notice in a row, I won the media gets, but it is not easy to name victory, because the most important criterion (download speed), according to which it is worth comparing these programs, it turned out to be the same in both the same and other program. Therefore, here the choice goes for the user - if you like a beautiful design and built-in chips (player, search, directory), then you should pay your gaze to MediaGet. But if it doesn't care at all, and for you in priority PC performance, then μTorrent is exactly for you.